|
History And Controversy:
Brand Proliferation & Exterior Corridors
9/5/2006
By Stanley Turkel
With the current
proliferation of new brands, it might be instructive to take a backward
look at earlier explosions of motels and hotels. As Confucius said,
“Study the past if you would divine the future.”
In the early 1900’s motels were the epitome of modernism—the
civilized evolution from tents to tourists cabins to auto courts to
motor courts. With the vast improvement in roads spurred on by the
visionary Carl G. Fisher’s building of the Lincoln Highway from New York
to San Francisco in 1917, the tourist cabin business grew into a large
industry. By 1925, Florida had 175 of the new roadside motor courts. In
the U.S., the number grew from 1,000 to 2,000 from 1920 to 1926.
On January 3, 1920, in the Saturday Evening Post, novelist Sinclair
Lewis wrote, “Somewhere in these states there is a young man who is
going to become rich. He may be washing milk bottles in a dairy lunch.
He is going to start a chain of small, clean, pleasant hotels,
standardized and nationally advertised, along every important motor
route in the country. He’s not going to waste money on gilt and onyx,
but he is going to have agreeable clerks, good coffee, endurable
mattresses and good lighting, and in every hotel he will have at least
one suite which, however small, will be as good as the average room in a
great modern city hotel. He will invade every town which hasn’t a good
hotel already.”
Despite the Depression, the number of motor courts increased from
9,800 in 1935 to 13,500 by 1939, with total guest registrations at about
225 million. By the early ‘40s, 25 million cars were registered, and 800
new motor courts were opening each year. Most of them offered private
baths, heating, inner-spring mattresses and rugs or carpeting. Only a
few had air conditioning or room phones.
After World War II, many veterans opened roadside motels resulting
in a total of 20,000 motels in 1940, 30,000 in 1948 and 61,000 by 1960.
The institution of the motel made a qualitative leap by the ‘60s, as it
evolved into the motor inn and motor hotel. This expansion was triggered
by the Federal-Aid Highway Act which President Dwight D. Eisenhower
signed into law in 1956. Over the next two decades, 47,000 miles of new
Interstate highways were built which attracted motor inns, fast food
franchises and a suburban residential construction boom (which continues
to this day).
The new motor inns were much more luxurious than their
predecessors. Most had swimming pools in elaborately landscaped
settings. There were bars, restaurants, coffee shops, meeting rooms,
lobbies and telephone switchboard service for the rooms—all of the
comforts of a downtown hotel but on the edge of town. Almost all had
exterior corridors with convenient adjacent parking areas and easy
access to guestrooms by traveling salesmen, handicapped people and
families with children.
As most of us know, the young man who fulfilled Sinclair Lewis’
prediction (except for the good coffee and good lighting) was Kemmons
Wilson, who in 1952 opened the first Holiday Inn in Memphis. By 1968,
the 1,000th Holiday Inn opened in San Antonio. By then, many competitors
had entered the marketplace: Howard Johnson (1954), Motel 6 (1962), Days
Inns of American (1970) and many others (Quality, Comfort, Rodeway,
Econolodge, Friendship, Ramada, Super 8, Travelodge, Best Western). Many
of these names are still in existence but now combined under new
ownership entities, such as Choice, Wyndham, Hilton, Marriott, Starwood
and Intercontinental.
Exterior Corridor Blues
As the new brands are rolled out, there
is a quiet but potentially explosive controversy simmering just below
the surface of the hotel franchising industry. It concerns the
defranchising of exterior-corridor properties—once the standard motel
design—and whether the traveling public considers them insecure and
outdated.
Some hotel franchisors have concluded that exterior-corridor
properties are obsolete and detrimental to their brands’ images. As a
result, they’re defranchising these motels to take advantage of current
market conditions and the possibility of franchising newer and more
modern properties.
Unfortunately, there is a dearth of reliable data regarding many of
the questions involved in this controversy:
- How many exterior-corridor properties
are in operation in the U.S.?
- What do travelers think about
exterior-corridor properties?
- Are these properties considered
outdated and undesirable?
- How many guests still would rather
park close to their rooms so they can
- see their SUVs and their possessions
- have a short walk with their luggage
- have the privacy and convenience of avoiding hotel lobbies,
elevators and long interior corridors?
- Do women guests believe that interior
corridor hotels are safer?
There are an estimated
500,000 brand-affiliated, exterior-corridor hotel rooms now operating in
the United States. If you add in independent properties, there are
probably one million rooms, or 30 percent of all domestic hotel rooms.
At a 50 percent occupancy and $30 Average Daily Rate, these hotels
generate nearly $5 billion in annual room revenues and pay $150 million
in royalty fees (using a conservative three-percent franchise fee).
In light of their constant claims of fairness in franchising, how
can franchise companies reconcile their rhetoric with the painful
reality facing hotel owners whose exterior-corridor properties are
losing value every day?
The hotel industry badly needs primary research on consumer
preferences for exterior corridor hotels. Franchisors and franchisees
should sponsor such research under the aegis of one or more of the
following: the American Hotel & Lodging Association, The Cornell Center
for Hospitality Research, the NYU Tisch Center for Hospitality, Tourism
and Sports Management and/or other hotel graduate schools at major
universities.
Stanley Turkel, MHS, ISHC, is a New York-based hotel consultant
specializing in franchising issues and asset management. He is a member
of the prestigious International Society of Hospitality Consultants.
Contact him at stanturkel@aol.com.
Courtesy of Hotel Interactive.
www.hotelinteractive.com.
|